dorkball-mcgee:

dorkball-mcgee:

Why did Stan Lee make a cameo in The Princess Diaries 2? Was this foreshadowing Disney buying Marvel? Is Princess Mia going to be an Avenger? So many questions

image

In case you though I was joking

(via myavengingvalkyrie)

endless list of my favorite people: dylan o’brien

(via fyesdylanobrien)

“Finally, in October 1945, a man with swampy eyes, feathers of hair, and a clean-shaven face walked into the shop. He approached the counter. “Is there someone here by the name of Leisel Meminger?”
"Yes, she’s in the back," said Alex. He was hopeful, but he wanted to be sure. "May I ask who is calling on her?"

Leisel came out.

They hugged and cried and fell to the floor.”

(Source: tardishearts, via arabellastrangely)

(Source: derivings, via laurielam)

Ben Wyatt: Human Disaster

(Source: karens-gillans, via cattink)

orbitalprimeval:

"LSD"…a collection of long-exposure photographs in a forest with the camera pointed up to space by Benoit Paillé.

(via tea-diver)

(Source: jesustoh, via tea-diver)

chevvybar:

*uses “u” and “you” in the same sentence*

(Source: emaciatinq, via sloed)

(Source: decoratedskin, via marykatewiles)

my favourite Sybil caps + pastels

(Source: agnesgreys, via arabellastrangely)

A Proposed General Rule about Pictures of Naked People

fishingboatproceeds:

I mean, I’m not saying that we can enforce this as law or anything. I also might be wrong about this. But:

Just as a general rule, I feel like we should not look at pictures of the breasts or genitalia of people who would rather we not look at pictures of their breasts or genitalia.

As a corollary to that general rule, I would add that I don’t see anything wrong with looking at pictures of breasts or genitalia of people who have invited us to do so. There seem to be plenty such pictures for us to get a reasonably good grasp of, like, the diversity of unclothed human anatomy without having to look at people who wish we wouldn’t.

This seems pretty straightforward to me. Yes, the photographer(s) who photographed Kate Middleton’s grainy distant breasts were violating her privacy. But so do people who choose to look at those pictures.

So maybe we can just agree not to? And this goes not only for princesses, I would argue, but also for people who send things to their romantic partners, who turn out to be jerks and release those photos publicly. Or people whose phones are hacked. etc.

In this world where most every curiosity can be satiated, it seems to me genuinely heroic to resist the urge to look at everything that can be seen, and instead to respect the wishes of those who feel violated or hurt by the availability of images they wish were private.

(Source: africant, via tessaviolet)

wolfwithafoxtail:

People think feminism means that there’s a group of women somewhere that want to take trousers with pockets away from men and give them to women, and give men trousers with fake pockets, while in reality feminism is the general idea that everyone should have trousers with pockets, because pockets are awesome.

(via tessaviolet)

(Source: n-i-c-k-s, via danisnotonfire)

8oo:

i think the coolest thing would be to see a new color

(via sincerelymiranda)